Guide · 15 min readThe classification changed. The caption rules did not.

What You Can Now Legally Say About a Token After the 2026 SEC and CFTC Reclassification

Token-claim permissibility is the question of which statements a marketing team may legally make about a crypto token in an ad, a caption, or a brief to a creator. It is decided by US anti-fraud and endorsement-disclosure law, whatever the token's classification under the March 2026 SEC and CFTC guidance. The reclassification changed what your token is. It did not change what you may say.

How we review clips before they post What crypto marketing costs

Rhys McKay, Founder & CEO·2026-08-04·Updated 2026-09-30

This is about short-form video clipping: long video cut into short vertical posts, not press clipping or media monitoring, not audio clipping, not the LA Clippers. This page explains the framework. It does not classify any specific token, and it is not legal advice. For that, retain securities counsel.

Key takeaways

The March 2026 guidance is a classification, not a marketing rulebook. It tells you which regulator owns your token; it does not tell your caption what to say.
Regulation Crypto Assets was proposed on 18 August 2026, and its comment period closed on 20 October 2026. If adopted, it would require an issuer's filed disclosures to match its website, official social accounts and whitepaper, so a caption that overpromises becomes part of the record.
The caption rules were already in force and still are: anti-fraud law, the anti-touting statute (Section 17(b)), and the FTC Endorsement Guides.
A caption can move a token between categories. Presented as a profit opportunity, a utility token can be pulled into the securities column. The wording, not the token, decides it.
The SEC dismissed classification cases, not promotion cases. Reading the dismissals as permission to make price claims misreads them.
Enforcement did not pause. The FY2025 record is 456 actions; the celebrity-promotion settlements stand.

What actually changed on 17 March 2026

On 17 March 2026 the SEC issued an interpretation, "SEC Clarifies the Application of Federal Securities Laws to Crypto Assets", which the CFTC joined to align how it administers the Commodity Exchange Act. It sorts crypto assets into five categories.

Category	Primary regulator	A security?
Digital commodities	CFTC	No
Digital collectibles	None named	No
Digital tools	None named	No
Stablecoins	None named	No
Digital securities	SEC	Yes

The four non-security rows reflect Chairman Atkins's characterisation of the framework, not settled law; classification is fact-specific, and this table classifies no specific token. A None named cell means the interpretation places that category outside securities law without assigning it a single primary federal regulator: only digital commodities (to the CFTC) and digital securities (to the SEC) get a named one. It does not mean the category is unregulated in general: payment stablecoins, for one, have their own federal framework under the GENIUS Act, enacted in July 2025, which the interpretation notes also excludes a payment stablecoin from a permitted issuer from the definition of a security. The interpretation also spells out how it treats common on-chain events, airdrops, mining, staking and wrapping, so a team knows which activities its analysis reaches.

Chairman Paul Atkins, speaking at the Digital Asset Summit in New York on 24 March 2026, said the framework "distinguishes between five categories of digital assets, four of which are not securities". That "four of five" reading is his characterisation, not language lifted from the release; the release carries the identifiers Securities Act Release 33-11412 and Exchange Act Release 34-105020, per its Federal Register notice, and "2026-30" is the SEC's press-release number, not the interpretation's.

Here is the part most summaries miss. The interpretation is a classification. It is not a rulebook for marketing. It tells you which regulator owns your token; it does not tell your caption what to say. The token safe harbour Chairman Atkins announced alongside it only became a formal proposal on 18 August 2026, covered in the next section.

What the August 2026 proposal, Regulation Crypto Assets, adds

Regulation Crypto Assets is a rule the SEC proposed on 18 August 2026 that would give token projects two ways to raise money without full registration, plus a safe harbour for when a token stops being part of an investment contract. It is a proposal, not a rule. The SEC's announcement says it follows the March interpretation; the Federal Register notice was published on 21 August 2026, and comments are due by 20 October 2026.

Part of the proposal	What it would do	What it means for a caption
Startup exemption	A one-time exemption for raises of up to $5 million over up to four years, with public filings at the start and end	Antifraud and antimanipulation law still applies to every statement
Fundraising exemption	Up to $20 million (Tier 1) or $75 million (Tier 2) in each 12 months, with financial statements and ongoing reports	Once qualified it is a public offering that may be advertised; what the ad says is still covered by antifraud law
Disclosure consistency	Filed disclosures must be consistent with the issuer's website, official social media accounts and promotional materials such as whitepapers	A caption on the project's own account becomes part of the record the filing is checked against
Investment contract safe harbour	Applies once the issuer has finished, or permanently stopped, the managerial work it promised, and has filed a certification with its analysis	A caption promising new team work after certifying is a line to clear with counsel first

Two lines in the proposal matter most to a marketing team. The first is the consistency rule in proposed Rule 103: an issuer's disclosures would have to match what it says on its website, its official social media accounts and its whitepaper. The second is the safe harbour condition that the issuer "is not making and does not intend to make any new representations or promises" of essential managerial efforts. Our reading, not a regulator's: once a team has certified, a caption saying the team will ship the next big thing is the kind of promise the condition is written against.

What the proposal leaves alone is the caption law. The SEC's fact sheet says issuers relying on either exemption "would remain subject to the antifraud and antimanipulation provisions of the federal securities laws". The proposal does not amend Section 17(b), and the FTC Endorsement Guides are the FTC's to change, not the SEC's. Everything below holds whether or not Regulation Crypto Assets is adopted.

The reclassification changed what your token is, not what you may say

The rules that govern a caption were already in force before March 2026, and they still are. Federal anti-fraud law applies to any statement about an investment: a materially false or misleading claim made in connection with a token is actionable no matter which of the five categories that token sits in.

The anti-touting statute, Section 17(b) of the Securities Act, makes it unlawful to describe a security "for a consideration received... without fully disclosing the receipt... and the amount thereof". The SEC's celebrity-promotion settlements stand. And the FTC Endorsement Guides govern paid endorsements across every product category.

The SEC did dismiss seven crypto enforcement actions from the prior administration, calling its new approach "a necessary course correction" in its fiscal 2025 results. Read that carefully: the same release describes them as "crypto firm registration-related" cases, not the promotion-and-disclosure cases. A promoter who reads the dismissals as permission to make price claims has misread them. The conduct that got celebrities fined was never on the list.

How a caption can turn a utility token into a security

The reclassification did sharpen one risk, and it is the one marketing controls. A token's category is not fixed by its code; it turns on how the asset is presented. Chairman Atkins made the point directly on 17 March 2026: the representations or promises "that generate reliance under Howey must be explicit and unambiguous".

Howey is the test that asks whether buyers expect a profit from the efforts of others. A caption is exactly where that expectation gets manufactured. "Built for on-chain payments" describes a tool. "Get in early before the team ships and it re-rates" describes an investment, and a token marketed that way can be pulled from the "digital tool" column into the "digital security" column, out of securities-free territory and into the SEC's. The wording, not the token, decides it.

Classification also runs the other way over time. As a network decentralises and no single team's efforts drive the expected return, the same token can move out of securities territory, the logic behind the safe harbour in Regulation Crypto Assets. In either direction the presentation is the lever, which puts the marketing team closer to the classification question than it usually assumes. Run any line you are unsure about through the checker below before it reaches a caption.

Token Claim Permissibility Checkertype a line · watch it get read

Paste a line from a caption or a creator brief. It renders on the phone, marks the words that carry risk, and returns a verdict with the rule and the enforcement action behind it. Tick the box if the post is paid. A guide to the rules, not a classification of your token and not legal advice.

Paste a line from your caption or creator briefThis post is paid (money or tokens changed hands)

utility statementA factual description of function. Permitted with substantiation: safe only while you hold the evidence that makes it true and frame it as a fact, not a reason the price will move.

substantiate itA utility or roadmap claim is permitted only while you hold the evidence that makes it true and frame it as a fact or a plan, not a reason the price will move.

This checker is a guide to the published rules and the enforcement record, not legal advice and not a classification of your token. It reads your own words against the claim table on this page; for any specific asset, retain securities counsel.

Have your captions reviewed before they post

What you may and may not say, claim by claim

Classification tells you which regime applies. Enforcement precedent tells you which words cross the line. The table below is the translation, and it holds whatever your token's category. The checker above runs the same rules on your own lines.

Claim in a caption	Verdict	Why, and the precedent
A price prediction ("this will 10x")	Prohibited	Manufactures the profit expectation; the promotion conduct the SEC has repeatedly settled
A guaranteed or "risk-free" return	Prohibited	Fraud risk on its face; no return is guaranteed
A paid post with no disclosure	Prohibited	Section 17(b) and the FTC Endorsement Guides both require disclosure
A utility statement ("used to pay network fees")	Permitted, with substantiation	A factual description you can evidence
A roadmap statement ("mainnet planned for Q4")	Permitted, with substantiation	Permitted if framed as a plan, not a profit promise
A paid post with a clear "#ad" disclosure	Required	The disclosure is the thing the law demands

Substantiation is the word that carries the permitted rows: a utility or roadmap claim is safe only while you hold the evidence that makes it true, and only while it is framed as a fact or a plan rather than a reason the price will move. The pattern is simple. Describe what the token does, and substantiate it. Never predict what its price will do, and never hide that a post was paid for.

What you can never say, whatever your token is

Some lines are prohibited in every category, and the enforcement record is specific about the cost.

$1,260,415the total the SEC fined Kim Kardashian in the EthereumMax matter (3 October 2022): a $1M penalty plus $250,000 disgorgement and $10,415.35 interest, and a three-year ban. Her failure was not disclosing the ~$250,000 she was paid for one Instagram post.

The law requires them to disclose to the public when and how much they are paid to promote investing in securities. SEC, on the Kim Kardashian settlement, 3 October 2022

On 22 March 2023 the SEC charged eight celebrities, including Lindsay Lohan, Jake Paul, Lil Yachty, Ne-Yo and Akon, for promoting the TRX and BTT tokens without disclosing they were paid; six of them settled for over $400,000 combined. The complaint alleged that Justin Sun was "specifically directing that they not disclose their compensation". Guaranteed returns, "risk-free", "safe", and specific price predictions belong to the same family of claims. None of them is worth the letter.

The three lines every crypto caption still needs

Whatever the token and whoever posts it, three elements keep a caption on the right side of the line. The FTC Endorsement Guides, effective 26 July 2023, require the disclosure to be "clear and conspicuous", defined as "difficult to miss (i.e., easily noticeable) and easily understandable by ordinary consumers", and in social media "the disclosure should be unavoidable".

A risk statement, in plain words

Crypto assets are volatile and you can lose your money. Say it plainly, not in legalese a scrolling viewer skips.

A no-guarantee line

Nothing in the post may read as a promise of return. If a phrase could be heard as "you will make money", cut it.

A paid-promotion disclosure that cannot be missed

Whenever money or tokens changed hands, a clear "#ad" or "paid partnership" placed where a scrolling viewer cannot avoid it. A "#ad" buried in the thirtieth hashtag fails the test, and Section 17(b) means it must name that a payment was made.

One paid post, two routes to the viewer

Follow one paid post from the brief to the feed. The raised tags travel with it until someone takes the label off.

Same payment on both lanes. Only the first is lawful: Section 17(b) and the FTC Endorsement Guides both turn on whether the label reaches the viewer.

Naming the payment is the step creators most often skip, and it is the exact failure the celebrity cases turned on.

The compliance line to put in every creator brief

The safest place to enforce all of this is not the caption, it is the brief the creator works from. When the rule travels with the brief, a hundred creators posting a hundred clips all clear the same bar, and no single post becomes the one that draws a letter. That is a process problem, not a legal one, and it is solvable before anything goes live: one pre-distribution pass is cheaper than one letter after it.

Read every caption and on-screen line against the claim table
Before a clip is cleared to post, run each line through the same rules the checker uses: describe the function, never the price.
Flag any price or guarantee wording
Price predictions, "10x", "guaranteed", "risk-free" and "safe" get cut or rewritten as a factual description you can substantiate.
Confirm the disclosure placement
Where money or tokens changed hands, check the paid-partnership disclosure sits where a scrolling viewer cannot miss it, and that it names the payment, per Section 17(b).
Clear it only when all three pass
One caption at a time, one bar for every creator. The clip goes out only after the line clears price, guarantee and disclosure.

Reviewed before it goes out

Enforcement did not pause for the reclassification. A promoter betting that a friendlier classification means a quieter enforcement desk is betting against the record.

456SEC enforcement actions in the fiscal year to 30 September 2025, per the Commission's own results.

$17.9Bin ordered relief that year, a gross figure dominated by a single Ponzi judgment, but a reminder the machinery is running.

8celebrities charged on 22 March 2023 over the TRX and BTT tokens for not disclosing they were paid.

That is why crypto clipping campaigns at Lumina Clippers are reviewed against these rules before distribution, across a network of 62,900+ vetted clippers who have driven 18B+ verified views. For the other jurisdictions, the MiCA marketing rules and the FCA crypto promotion rules; for the broader question, is clipping legal; and for budgets, what crypto marketing costs. Lumina Clippers is a clipping agency that distributes brand videos through 62,900+ clippers.

Reading the seven dismissed cases as permission. The SEC itself calls them registration-related cases, not promotion-and-disclosure cases. The conduct that fined celebrities was never on that list.
Predicting the price. "This will 10x", "re-rate", "get in early" manufacture the profit expectation that can pull a utility token into securities territory. Describe the function instead.
Promising a guaranteed or "risk-free" return. Fraud risk on its face. No token return is guaranteed, and "safe" is in the same family.
Burying the disclosure. A "#ad" in the thirtieth hashtag fails the FTC's "unavoidable" standard. It has to sit where a scrolling viewer cannot miss it.
Not naming the payment. Section 17(b) requires disclosing that a payment was made and its amount. Skipping this is the exact failure the celebrity cases turned on.
Assuming the classification decides the caption. It decides which regulator owns the token. The caption is decided by anti-fraud law, Section 17(b) and the FTC Guides, whatever the category.
Treating Regulation Crypto Assets as permission to hype. It is a proposal about raising money. Issuers using it stay under antifraud law, and it would tie the filing to what the project's own accounts say.

Can I say my token will go up in value?

No. Price-appreciation and price-prediction language is the highest-risk claim there is. It can manufacture the expectation of profit that pulls your token into securities territory, and it echoes the promotion conduct the SEC has repeatedly settled. Describe what the token does instead.

Is my token a security now?

The March 2026 framework sets five categories, and Chairman Atkins on 24 March 2026 described four of the five as not securities. Which one your token is depends on its facts. This page does not classify any specific asset, and that call needs securities counsel.

What changed in 2026 for crypto marketing?

The classification changed, not the marketing rules. Anti-fraud law, the anti-touting statute in Section 17(b), and the FTC Endorsement Guides still decide what a caption may say, exactly as they did before March 2026. The SEC's August 2026 proposal, Regulation Crypto Assets, would add offering exemptions without changing those rules.

Do creators have to disclose they were paid?

Yes. Section 17(b) requires disclosing paid promotion of a security and its amount, and the FTC Endorsement Guides require the disclosure to be clear, conspicuous and, online, unavoidable. The 22 March 2023 case, in which eight celebrities were charged over the TRX and BTT tokens, shows what skipping it costs.

What wording gets me an enforcement letter?

Guaranteed or risk-free returns, "safe", specific price predictions, and any paid post without a visible disclosure. Those are the claims with an enforcement record behind them. Kim Kardashian paid the SEC $1.26 million in 2022 over a single Instagram post that did not disclose the $250,000 she was paid for it.

What is Regulation Crypto Assets?

Regulation Crypto Assets is a rule the SEC proposed on 18 August 2026. It would add a startup exemption for raises of up to $5 million over four years, a fundraising exemption of up to $75 million in each 12 months, and a safe harbour for when a token stops being subject to an investment contract. It is a proposal, not yet a rule.

Is Regulation Crypto Assets in effect yet?

No. The SEC proposed it on 18 August 2026 and the Federal Register published it on 21 August 2026, with comments due by 20 October 2026. The Commission has to consider the comments and vote to adopt a final rule before any of it applies, and the final version can differ from the proposal.

Does Regulation Crypto Assets change what influencers can say about a token?

No. The proposal adds ways to raise money, not new permission to promote. Issuers using its exemptions stay subject to antifraud law, it does not amend Section 17(b), which requires a paid promoter of a security to disclose the payment and its amount, and the FTC Endorsement Guides still require a clear, unavoidable disclosure on social media.

Sources

The 2026 framework. SEC, "SEC Clarifies the Application of Federal Securities Laws to Crypto Assets", press release 2026-30, 17 March 2026. SEC, Chairman Paul Atkins, remarks at the Digital Asset Summit, 24 March 2026. SEC, Chairman Paul Atkins, "Regulation Crypto Assets: A Token Safe Harbor", 17 March 2026.

The August 2026 proposal. SEC, "SEC Proposes New Regulation Crypto Assets", press release 2026-76, 18 August 2026. SEC, Regulation Crypto Assets fact sheet, Release 33-11434. Federal Register, "Regulation Crypto Assets", 21 August 2026, comments due 20 October 2026.

Enforcement. SEC, FY2025 enforcement results, press release 2026-34. SEC, "SEC Charges Kim Kardashian for Unlawfully Touting Crypto Security", press release 2022-183, 3 October 2022, and the administrative order, Release 33-11116. SEC, "SEC Charges Crypto Entrepreneur Justin Sun and his Companies... and Eight Celebrities", press release 2023-59, 22 March 2023.

The caption law. FTC, Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials, 16 CFR Part 255, §255.0, effective 26 July 2023. Securities Act of 1933, Section 17(b), 15 U.S.C. 77q(b).

Method. The five-category table reflects Chairman Atkins's characterisation of the March 2026 interpretation, not settled law, and classifies no specific token. The checker applies the published claim table and enforcement record to the reader's own words; it is not legal advice. Sources checked at publication, 4 August 2026, and again on 30 September 2026, when the August proposal was added.

Every clip we distribute is reviewed against these rules before it goes out

Send us the token and the markets you are targeting. Our crypto team reviews every caption and on-screen line against the claim table above before a single clip is cleared to post, so no one post becomes the one that draws a letter.

Talk to the crypto team

Rhys McKay · Founder & CEO, Lumina Clippers

Has led clipping campaigns delivering 18B+ views across a network of 62,900+ clippers

Rhys founded Lumina Clippers in 2025 and has run short-form distribution campaigns for crypto, SaaS, gaming, music and founder brands. He writes on clipping strategy, creator-led growth and brand visibility. Connect on LinkedIn · About the team →

More from the blog

Guide

Token Launch Marketing: A Plan for Before, At and After the TGE

2026-06-25 · 14 min Guide

What Canadian Stores Get Wrong About Product Marketing

2026-10-30 · 17 min Guide

MiCA Crypto Marketing Rules: What a Brand Can and Cannot Say in the EU

2026-08-02 · 18 min

← Back to all articles